OKX really has strategic determination, regardless of how other companies make money by listing various coins. Year after year, they steadfastly choose compliance and product routes, which means sacrificing a lot of short-term profits in front of them. The path each company takes reflects the values of its founders. When wealth reaches a certain stage, there is a pursuit of a sense of achievement on a spiritual level.

Update on the latest views of $pythia: 1. Last week, $pythia experienced a lot of turnover at the 100M position, with many people's take-profit points set at 100M. It seems the market makers got a bit anxious; just two days after breaking through 100M, they were still buying, probably accumulating a few million. Despite so many people selling on the 21st and 22nd, there was still a net inflow of nearly 2M. By the 23rd, the market makers changed their strategy and started to wash the market, likely feeling that they had spent too much ammo, having already spent over 10M by now. The wash led to a lot of retail investors fleeing, and it was evident that the wash was quite aggressive. I thought it would at least take a day or two, but instead, they pulled the liquidity and then quickly pushed it back to 100M. The reason for such a rapid wash and quick recovery, as @druzbtc told me, is that many players in this market can't handle too much volatility, so the wash won't go too deep. 2. This month is likely to be dominated by washing and consolidation; it won't drop much, nor will it rise significantly. This time is meant to wash out those who can't hold on, as they have set up a one-sided pool, so many people probably won't buy and may even sell. Interestingly, it seems they don't need many crypto players to buy into this market; it's mostly the market makers pulling it up and offline clients buying. The advantage of this is that the volatility is smaller and more stable. I have always believed that the strategy of pulling the market without regard to cost is something we may not understand, as there could be someone waiting to buy at a higher position. We just need to hold steady and hope that after this wash, we can reach a new height in August. 🤣

Playing with the market or finding narratives is actually related to personal character. For example, some people prefer to cast a wide net, while others like to focus on a few targets and invest heavily in them. Those who enjoy playing with the market are likely to dislike situations that are completely out of their control; they can only place bets and hold on when they have a clearer view. This is similar to the tight-aggressive, loose-aggressive, or tight-passive styles in Texas Hold'em; there is no right or wrong way to play, just strategies. For oneself, it’s essential to find a trading model that truly suits you based on a deep understanding of yourself. It’s not about how others do it; if someone else's betting style allows them to sleep well but you can’t, then it’s not suitable for you. I think a better approach is to ignore those who have different trading models and seek out your peers. Everyone can collaborate and strive to capture more targets within the same trading model, maximizing value as much as possible, and that should be enough.

There is no need to say much about the strong village Unexpectedly, this week's goal of 100M was achieved just Tuesday @druzbtc. Originally, last night's $pythia could have rushed to 100M, but there are many retail investors in this position to take profits, in this case, there was a net inflow of 1.18M yesterday, basically knowing that it was stable. For me, it doesn't matter what brain or rat is, these are just stories. Only focus on the most important indicator, which is the banker's style of play. I told @0xCryptoWing that this kind of sincere banker is really rare, and he won't let you down even on the four-hour line, basically as long as there is a profit and smash the market in seconds. If this kind of sincere banker can't make a lot of money, then there is really no way. I think after the game of 100M is over, there is a high probability that it will continue to go up, and many things that should be sold are almost sold. Set another 200M weekly goal. 🤣

I have heard many bankers say that most of them are flickering, because the market and the banker are essentially rivals. For example, if the market-making funds are prepared for a few meters, the banker is very powerful, and then add a little bit to the pool, so that you can all hold it, and he frames it. The total @0xCryptoFries of fries used the OKX wallet API to count the inflows, with a net inflow of 316 wu in the past five days. Now that the $pythia pool is 10m+, I talked to @druzbtc about if the pool were twice as small, the market value would have been 2-300 million. He said it was okay, the pool was small and the whale didn't play. Sometimes don't look at what the banker says, it depends on how the banker does, when the two are inconsistent, please refer to the price.

Originally sold at 35M $pythia, but recently I thought about it and chased it all the way. This coin is basically incomprehensible, and it took almost 10M of funds to come over. I reflected on it, and I couldn't understand that it might not be Zhuang's problem, but my own problem. Everyone will think that how to withdraw from such a pull bank, either not in this way, or pure stupid money. I chose to believe that I am not here, and I hope to reach 100M next week. 🤣

My own habit is that for some projects that I have invested in or focused on, I will follow the progress from time to time to see if it is consistent with my original judgment. Mira's project was analyzed by Messari in May, Kaito was launched in June, and the Verify system was just launched this month, and the rhythm is still very stable. I took a look at this system, and the practical value is full. For example, the picture below, people who don't know, you don't know where there is a problem with this sentence, even if it has been in the currency circle for a long time, it may be confused. Because Satoshi Nakamoto did get a reward of 50 bitcoins for the first time, but only transferred 10 of them to cryptographer Howl. Finney. This is the value of mira's Verify system, which verifies the authenticity and accuracy of an AI output through multiple models, and then annotates it, and provides an API interface, plug-and-play. This is another powerful tool for creators who rely on AI-generated content.

I don't want to judge the right or wrong of brushing, after all, everyone has their own choice. It is understandable to use this to have more negotiation space with the project party, but it may be that in the long run, the easiest thing to be deceived is not others, but yourself. When it comes so easy to increase followers, it's easy to stop thinking about what the essence of Twitter is. It will make you farther and farther away from the truth, and farther and farther away from your true self.

Many people believe in fatalism, and I personally believe in fate, but why bother? In my opinion, life is factory setting, and luck can be fought for. Your factory settings can't be decided. There are people who are born in Rome and have an extremely high starting point, which really cannot be chosen and cannot be changed. But the meaning of hard work is to decide whether you can touch the upper limit of your destiny. For example, some people may have a fate range of 1–10, and some may have a range of 10–50. If you don't make an effort, you may stop at 1 or 10 forever; But if you work hard enough, you can get close to the limit of 10, or even reach the ceiling of 50. The meaning of hard work is to keep you as close as possible to the upper limit of destiny and reach your own extreme.

Muscle reactions formed when starting a new team after many years of entrepreneurship: Is the business model working? Is it in line with long-termism? What kind of talent is needed for this business model? What are the qualities and capabilities of the partners? What are my own strengths and what kind of position is it suitable for? How should the organization divide labor, and is the organizational structure modular and scalable in the future? What kind of pace should be suitable for the current stage, fast or slow?