ethereum: user buys eth, user submits txn, network burns gas hyperliquid: user submits txn, network burns gas (trading fee), network buys hype imo current doc language is suboptimal: - drop the assistance fund name - confirm it as a one way door buyback means something else

it’s important to not be lazy about skeuomorphisms if my trading fees were hype-denominated to begin with, we wouldn’t even be discussing buybacks, but the UX would be a whole lot worse despite the same end effect