TPS is better than slow. It is true that it cannot be just tps. The slowness of BTC did not affect the popularity of inscriptions, but in the long run, it did affect the development of the Bitcoin ecosystem.
Phyrex
Phyrex18.8. klo 00.08
I hope #OKX don't go down the wrong path, every time I see a comparison through TPS, I worry that if the world can develop better with TPS alone, $ETH may have returned to zero long ago, and in 2021, many public chains are using TPS's lead as ETH killers, and most of the killers have fallen. Whether a public chain can go a long way, the first element is what kind of application it has, what kind of troubles it can solve, whether it can achieve better decentralization, and whether it can give investors the opportunity to make a profit. Before relying on Meme, #SOL walked by, and it turned out to be a casino chain, which is the adjective that Solana wants to get rid of the most from top to bottom. On the contrary, I think X Layer can pay more attention to decentralized transactions themselves, build cross-chain acceptance and liquidity structures, and focus on transaction support to have opportunities, and it is not crucial to roll TPS or low gas itself. When the inscription was indicated, the gas on BTC was more expensive, which hindered investors' enthusiasm? Instead, a lot of BTC layer-2 networks focus on cheapness, what is the result?
1,68K