This is such a silly statement. As a protocol founder I have been surveying a lot of users and whales about their intentions with tokens they get. The overwhelming majority plan to sell them for hype. If true then there is no alignment to be had, nor sought after. There is only a trade. Having this born expectation that the only way to alignment is to feed your users an avenue to acquire more hype is silly. Ownership in something needs to come at a cost, it’s not an avenue to further grow bags. For transparency: What do I plan to do with assets I earn from other projects? I plan to sell them for $hype and here in lies the founders dilemma. We’re all after the same thing, let’s not be cute about it, let’s just all talk as the traders we are.
Peggy.hl
Peggy.hl10.8. klo 11.12
Hyperliquid reserved 76.2% of the HYPE supply for it's community If your protocol only reserves 10-20% for it's community, gives 30% to VCs, another 10% to marketmakers/cex/liquidity etc etc, it is definitely NOT community aligned/Hyperliquid aligned
@sheriff_hl In fact the only movement of the treasury to date was for the HL hackathon bounty.
95,57K