Nakamoto coefficients are not a good way to measure decentralization. They can be easily gamed, and considering a mining pool as a single entity in this context is highly misleading. Leaning into this metric, which is not defined precisely enough to avoid a biased interpretation, puts Kaspa in line with projects like Nano and Chia, who lean heavily into it because that's the only narrative they can extract from their mordbidly misaligned incentives. Kaspa doesn't need optics that place it in the same rubric when it can provide infinitely better justifications for its superiority.