Riflessioni del giorno, 1/8/25: Sono d'accordo con @FedGuy12. La coraggiosa Bowman ha giustamente criticato il pusillanime Powell, e ora sta giustamente criticando il parsimonioso Powell. JPOW = Maestro di pattinaggio verso dove era il disco
Michael Kao
Michael Kao31 lug 2025
La cosa che mi piace di Bold Bowman è che non ha peli sulla lingua e dice le cose come stanno quando i fatti cambiano. Ha criticato Pusillanimous Powell per il suo inspiegabile Premature Pivot, e ora sta criticando Parsimonious Powell per la sua nuova intransigenza. Devi amare l'Anti-Gretzky dei presidenti della Fed: JPOW è un maestro nel pattinare dove il disco ERA...
@JohnCarey17 @FedGuy12 Trump ha ora l'opzione di un capro espiatorio e scommetto che è segretamente felice. 😂
Michael Kao
Michael Kao22 lug 2025
Musings of the Day, 7/21/25: One key lesson from Trump 1.0 is that he likes to keep folks guessing about his true intentions while maximizing optionality to maneuver. Case in point: A lot of folks are fretting over Trump’s noise over firing Powell, citing his increasingly aggressive rhetoric. In this case, I think the bluster is intentional with little/no intent to back it up. I see very low probability of this outcome, simply because he would be giving away optionality to maneuver — especially during ongoing Tariff negotiations. By vociferously castigating Powell (but not doing anything about it), Trump has set up the perfect Fall Guy if the economy takes a dump for ANY reason. The transition of Pusillanimous Powell to Parsimonious Powell creates a perfect scapegoat that allows him to be aggressive on Tariffs: Heads: the economy slows down, and Powell’s hand is forced anyway. Tails: Powell stays intransigent, and Trump has a free scapegoat option until 2026.
Scommetto che Trump è segretamente felice per l'intransigenza di JPOW—gli offre l'opzione di un capro espiatorio.
Michael Kao
Michael Kao22 lug 2025
Musings of the Day, 7/21/25: One key lesson from Trump 1.0 is that he likes to keep folks guessing about his true intentions while maximizing optionality to maneuver. Case in point: A lot of folks are fretting over Trump’s noise over firing Powell, citing his increasingly aggressive rhetoric. In this case, I think the bluster is intentional with little/no intent to back it up. I see very low probability of this outcome, simply because he would be giving away optionality to maneuver — especially during ongoing Tariff negotiations. By vociferously castigating Powell (but not doing anything about it), Trump has set up the perfect Fall Guy if the economy takes a dump for ANY reason. The transition of Pusillanimous Powell to Parsimonious Powell creates a perfect scapegoat that allows him to be aggressive on Tariffs: Heads: the economy slows down, and Powell’s hand is forced anyway. Tails: Powell stays intransigent, and Trump has a free scapegoat option until 2026.
E scommetto che Bessent è segretamente felice per l'intransigenza di JPOW--ci aiuterà a scadenza il nostro Debito! 😂
41,55K