Reflexiones del Día, 1/8/25: Estoy de acuerdo con @FedGuy12. La audaz Bowman llamó correctamente la atención sobre el pusilánime Powell, y ahora está señalando correctamente al parsimonioso Powell. JPOW = Maestro de patinaje hacia donde estaba el puck.
Michael Kao
Michael Kao31 jul 2025
Lo que me gusta de Bold Bowman es que no tiene pelos en la lengua y dice las cosas como son cuando cambian los hechos. Ella criticó a Pusillanimous Powell por su inexplicable Pivot Prematuro, y ahora está criticando a Parsimonious Powell por su nueva intransigencia. Tienes que amar a la Anti-Gretzky de los presidentes de la Fed: JPOW es un maestro en patinar hacia donde estaba el puck…
@JohnCarey17 @FedGuy12 Trump ahora tiene la opción de chivo expiatorio y apuesto a que está secretamente feliz. 😂
Michael Kao
Michael Kao22 jul 2025
Musings of the Day, 7/21/25: One key lesson from Trump 1.0 is that he likes to keep folks guessing about his true intentions while maximizing optionality to maneuver. Case in point: A lot of folks are fretting over Trump’s noise over firing Powell, citing his increasingly aggressive rhetoric. In this case, I think the bluster is intentional with little/no intent to back it up. I see very low probability of this outcome, simply because he would be giving away optionality to maneuver — especially during ongoing Tariff negotiations. By vociferously castigating Powell (but not doing anything about it), Trump has set up the perfect Fall Guy if the economy takes a dump for ANY reason. The transition of Pusillanimous Powell to Parsimonious Powell creates a perfect scapegoat that allows him to be aggressive on Tariffs: Heads: the economy slows down, and Powell’s hand is forced anyway. Tails: Powell stays intransigent, and Trump has a free scapegoat option until 2026.
Apuesto a que Trump está secretamente feliz por la intransigencia de JPOW; le da la opción de un chivo expiatorio.
Michael Kao
Michael Kao22 jul 2025
Musings of the Day, 7/21/25: One key lesson from Trump 1.0 is that he likes to keep folks guessing about his true intentions while maximizing optionality to maneuver. Case in point: A lot of folks are fretting over Trump’s noise over firing Powell, citing his increasingly aggressive rhetoric. In this case, I think the bluster is intentional with little/no intent to back it up. I see very low probability of this outcome, simply because he would be giving away optionality to maneuver — especially during ongoing Tariff negotiations. By vociferously castigating Powell (but not doing anything about it), Trump has set up the perfect Fall Guy if the economy takes a dump for ANY reason. The transition of Pusillanimous Powell to Parsimonious Powell creates a perfect scapegoat that allows him to be aggressive on Tariffs: Heads: the economy slows down, and Powell’s hand is forced anyway. Tails: Powell stays intransigent, and Trump has a free scapegoat option until 2026.
Y apuesto a que Bessent está secretamente feliz por la intransigencia de JPOW--¡va a ayudarlo a refinanciar nuestra Deuda! 😂
41.55K