This is true. And this is what @xeetdotai is doing to fix it. 1⃣Cleanse our boards of people who are trying to game the system and are not providing real value to the brands that run tournaments. This is causing a lot of noise. But it is the right thing to do. And while I saw someone make an excuse that the platform they are advising has less clients because they are "protecting creators", the truth is clients are not using them because their leaderboards are filled with farmers and botnet users. So they come to us. Furthermore, we have turned down some of the clients that they did not turn down.... So there is that. 2⃣ Bring on projects that will deliver a good ROI for creators. Admittedly we have had to refine this process, as we had some that did not provide a great ROI. That being said, expectations have to be reasonable as well. You can't expect to get rich because you make 20-30 posts about a project over a 3 month period. This desire to provide a good ROI is another reason why we usually do Top 100. This delivers a bigger piece of the pie for each of the winners. 3⃣Provide as many opportunities for creators to choose from as possible. Our job is to avoid rugs and bad actors. Our job is not to predict which TGE's will be successful. If we had the answer to that, I would just put all my money into trading those TGE's. Why hassle with running a business? So yeah, we will bring clients for flash tournaments with lower payouts and lower durations. YOU can choose whether you want to participate or not. That is the beauty of InfoFi. It creates a marketplace for both brands and creators. 4⃣ Creator Cards You will see soon enough. 5⃣ - 🔟 Not telling you. Because we don't want our competition to copy us.

Going to give @leonabboud a hard time here since he has been a critic of InfoFi What’s the difference between “littering”the timeline with InfoFi projects who are seeking distribution and littering the timeline with clips of the same thing because you want distribution?

$250k pool Xeeters winning again