Trending topics
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.
< @brevis_zk - If the architecture is different, the market is also different >
In this video, Brevis clearly explains why they do not see themselves in competition with other zk projects by comparing themselves to them. The key point is not just a simple performance comparison, but that the architecture and market approach itself are different!
1️⃣ Single zkVM vs. Full Computing Stack
Most existing zk projects are based on a single zkVM. This limits the operations that can be performed and often keeps applicable use cases in simple areas.
In contrast, Brevis offers a full computing stack that combines not just one zkVM, but a zkVM with multiple zk coprocessors. The Glue and Coprocessor architecture that Brevis talks about allows for various operations to be combined modularly, and they explain that they were the first to pioneer this structure.
2️⃣ The zkVM that made real-time zk proofs possible for the first time
Brevis has distinct differentiators even within the zkVM itself. It is the first zkVM to achieve real-time zk proofs for over 99.5% of more than 45 million gas blocks.
This is a case that proves zk technology can operate in real-time in actual blockchain environments, moving beyond theoretical or experimental stages. Additionally, they anticipate achieving top-level performance benchmarks once again with the upcoming new zkVM version.
3️⃣ Focus on actual apps, not rollups
Another differentiator for Brevis is its market entry strategy. While existing solutions focused on converting optimistic rollups to zk rollups, Brevis concentrates on applications that actually have users.
They provide verifiable computing for dApps used by hundreds of thousands of users daily, rather than just hundreds or thousands. The key point is that they are expanding zk technology based on real-use apps in various environments, including the BNB chain.
4️⃣ Network value created by workloads
This strategy directly impacts Brevis's Prover network. As the number of apps with actual user traffic increases, the Prover network experiences a massive workload.
This leads to a structure where the entire network can capture value, expanding beyond simple technology provision to a sustainable infrastructure model.
🔍 Summary
To summarize the message emphasized by Brevis this time:
- The architecture is different
- The market entry approach is different
- The structure in which value accumulates is also different
Brevis is not a project that creates just one zkVM, but is building an infrastructure that expands zk computing centered around apps that are actually used. This aspect most clearly illustrates why Brevis is referred to as the next-generation zk project.

Top
Ranking
Favorites
