> it's true that not every enterprise will run its own chain. it depends a lot on the use case they are building > since we are in the CeFi era of Crypto, most financial institutions will indeed run a chain since it's the only way they can launch in a secure, private and compliant way > it's also true that running a chain has become easier/cheaper the past 2 years and the logical progress is that it will be commoditized > the main fallacy in👇argument is that running a chain is "context" and not "core". this is wrong. running a chain itself isn't a differentiator but it enables differentiation in many levels through customizing and owning the experience. the same way that owning a store isn't per se a differentiator VS running a store in a mall but it allows a retailer to do all kinds of customer engagement things that they can't do in a mall
Mippo 🟪
Mippo 🟪11.8. klo 07.09
I have fully come around to the rollup architecture. Yes everyone can build their own chain, and many with large existing distribution (sc Robinhood) will try. However, running a chain isn't core to 98% of businesses out there. Conseneus and shared DA need to happen but most companies won't choose that vector to differentiate. Why would they? If you're building onchain social, retail brokerage, etc... why do you want to get into the nitty gritty of the infra? It's extra operational cost and a massive splintering of focus. So what I would expect is many companies try to build their own chains over the next two or three years before eventually giving up and using Ethereum, Celestia, Arbitrum, etc...
2,99K