Yesterday, I attended a certain RWA conference in Hong Kong and listened to some leaders from traditional companies speak and participate in a roundtable. It was clear that they lack a structured knowledge system for this industry. This is also a significant challenge faced by many institutions or individuals who have recently entered the market during this wave of RWA stablecoin hype: - Fragmented knowledge system information - Difficulty in systematic learning - Unable to find good learning paths - Misinformation everywhere, making it hard to discern, and so on. These knowledge systems are often the result of years of experience in the industry, and much of the information has not been well consolidated; it remains in people's minds. For those who have mastered the knowledge system, not educating these newcomers may be the optimal strategy, as it helps maintain the high premium and scarcity of their professional barriers, allowing them to perform better in this field. "The more people understand, the fewer opportunities there are."

On July 18, the GENIUS Act was officially signed into law by President Trump, sparking significant global attention to stablecoins. After a decade of calls by some pioneers in the blockchain industry, the mainstream public opinion's attitude towards this field has changed repeatedly, and the relevant discussion has finally broken the circle. For a while, stablecoins have become the hottest topic, and @myanTokenGeek will discuss them for you through this article.

Let's talk about stablecoins with Xiao Feng: return to the essence of technology and avoid conceptual misunderstandings #RWA #稳定币 On July 18, the #GENIUS bill was officially signed into law by President Trump, sparking significant global attention to stablecoins. After a decade of calls by some pioneers in the blockchain industry, the mainstream public opinion's attitude towards this field has changed repeatedly, and the relevant discussion has finally broken the circle. For a time, whether it is the Internet industry, the traditional financial circle or the macro policy discussion circle, stablecoins have become the hottest topic. People are beginning to rethink the impact and impact of the large-scale application of digital currency on the Internet, artificial intelligence, finance, and even the geopolitical and economic situation. However, under the heat, a large number of cognitive confusion, information distortion and even misleading views have emerged, and they have been widely disseminated through self-media, causing some cognitive misunderstandings. The root cause is that these discussions are large-scale, without considering that stablecoins are one of the innovative products of blockchain technology, and not discussing the nature and application of stablecoins from the perspective of technical logic. To this end, Teacher Meng Yan @myanTokenGeek had another conversation with Dr. Xiao Feng and discussed this issue. Meng Yan: Dr. Xiao, after our last conversation, the situation has progressed rapidly as expected. Now that the GENIUS bill has been passed, I have observed that the interest in stablecoins in the Chinese community has rapidly heated up, almost to the point of being hotly discussed by the whole people. A friend of mine just came back from Hong Kong and told me that everyone in Hong Kong is talking about stablecoins, and I really "have never seen such a situation". You are in Hong Kong, and you must be deeply touched. Xiao Feng: It is indeed a situation that has not been seen in many years. Not only discussion, but also active action. Hundreds of companies and institutions are lining up to participate in stablecoins, and news on RWA-related actions is also updated daily. We now receive a lot of cooperation intentions every day. The significance of the GENIUS Act is not only to clearly establish the legitimacy and sovereignty of "US dollar stablecoins" in the U.S. legal system, but also to send a clear signal that blockchain and crypto assets have begun to move from the gray area to the mainstream financial system, and a new revolution in financial infrastructure has officially begun. As a global financial centre, this sensitivity is not surprising in this new trend. I do feel a little emotional when I see this situation, as a historical experience, being proactive in the face of new technologies and trying boldly can almost always get great rewards. History has almost always sided with the optimistic and enterprising side of new technologies. Meng Yan: But I also see some hidden concerns - this wave of stablecoin opportunities came very suddenly, many people were not prepared at all, and there were gaps in their perception. Many people even heard about stablecoins three months ago, swallowed dates, heard about it, and began to claim to be experts on the media, amplifying the volume to spread many opinions, some of which I think are misleading. Xiao Feng: I have seen a lot of self-media content recently, and I feel the same way. Of course, first of all, I am happy with the current atmosphere of discussion. Isn't such a situation where the whole society is hotly discussing stablecoins that we have been asking for for so many years? Now, the industry is ushering in a big era. In the next few years, stablecoins, RWAs, token economics, currency-stock linkage, and the integration of crypto and AI will be very lively and exciting. However, at times like this, we need to calm down and go back to consolidate our cognition. According to past experience, as soon as spring arrives and the temperature rises, it is easy to breed all kinds of plausible cognitions and concepts, and some sensational erroneous views are very popular, planting the seeds of risk in the market. Cognition and perception are important. In the past, the ups and downs of the crypto market, the industry's misdirection, and people's emotions were repeatedly the result of misconceptions. The first is to have an appropriate estimate of the environment. Many people think that the US legislation has been passed, and the crypto industry in Hong Kong and even China will soon be fully liberalized, and even began to start laying out on this premise. This is certainly unrealistic. There are still many issues to be resolved in regulation, which will take time. The final landing plan must also be unruly, and it is impossible to let it go. Let me give you an example, will stablecoins make it easier to launder money after leaving the banking system? Therefore, any person in charge of the regulator will definitely put forward very strict requirements for anti-money laundering of stablecoins. In addition, there are also relatively large misunderstandings and even errors in the understanding of stablecoins, RWA and blockchain. This incident happened suddenly, and it is true that many people are "standing on the tuyere as soon as they enter the industry", with enthusiasm and traffic, but there is a deficit in cognition, and there is no time to make up lessons, and the judgment is relatively rough. We also have a responsibility to point out this situation. Discussing stablecoins cannot be separated from their technical attributes …… To be continued

Recently, I have often recommended Brother Yu's "Blockchain Dark Forest Self-Help Manual" to those confident and scolding Fang Qiu's three-week quick stablecoin experts. If we, geeks who have been on the chain for ten years, have a nearly 100% probability of being stolen and deceived, and you promote stablecoin applications on a large scale, attract a billion people, but don't understand security issues, then you just wait to die.

I haven't seen much on Twitter lately, but I just took a look and found that everyone is discussing the valuation of Ethemum. In this way, I provide a perspective: The prevailing forecast now is that stablecoin issuance will reach $3 trillion by 2030. Consider how many of them will run on Ethereum or settle on Ethereum? According to the principle of POS, if you control 51% of your stake, you can take all these stablecoins for yourself. So theoretically, if you spend half of Ethereum's market capitalization to buy enough ETH, conduct a 51% attack, and then earn enough stablecoins to pay for itself, then this is a worthwhile thing to do. Conversely, Ethereum's market capitalization must be at least twice the market capitalization of all stablecoins on it to be secure enough. Currently, USDT is issued on Ethereum with about $78 billion and USDC with $42 billion, which together is $120 billion, accounting for 46% of the total market value of stablecoins. If this percentage drops to 33% in the future, the issuance of stablecoins on Ethereum should reach $1 trillion by 2030. At that time, Ethereum's market capitalization should be at least $2 trillion to ensure the security of the network. Maybe someone has said it a long time ago, so let's think of it as a pick-up of people's teeth.

Stablecoins are on fire, we have laid out three years in advance, and now various opportunities have emerged, and we have seen a lot of projects. If you can smell some rancid smell from the beginning, you don't have to have a fluke mentality, not only will you die, but you will inevitably tear it apart.

A few months ago, I can't remember who told me that Wall Street institutions were raising funds.

Recently, I have been reading more books and posting less. For the past two days, I have been reading the history of the Soviet Union, the paragraph of my loving father. Everyone knows a lot about great benevolence before the war, but in fact, his old man was even more merciful after the war. Several leaders of the Leningrad region slightly lowered the figures of the production plan, and a group of 14 people was pulled out by him for mercy. Reading this paragraph, I suddenly had some thoughts about the current situation.

SolvBTC is now integrated into @worldlibertyfi's USD1 Vault on @lista_dao. → Borrow fully backed USD1 using SolvBTC → Earn 15% APY via @Re7Labs vaults → Tap into a secure, transparent, and on-chain liquidity layer for your Bitcoin What this partnership means for BTC-native finance 🧵👇

Stablecoins are not just impacting the existing order in the currency circle Rather, it is a Trojan horse of the blockchain, which will eventually impact the existing global order, the existing Westphalian system Trump's torn free trade system and the changed post-World War II international order are compared to this It's just pediatrics