There is a battle in abstracting UX right now While this is happening there are a lot of projects focusing on what is technically possible. When that might not be the actual path needed to find PMF on the high time frame. @wardenprotocol is a good example Warden Protocol takes an AI-native approach to blockchain, focusing on: ~ Asynchronous Verifiable Resources (AVRs) for off-chain computation ~ Statistical Proof of Execution (SPEX) for AI result verification ~ Multi-chain compatibility (Cosmos, Ethereum, Solana) While technically innovative, Warden's approach adds complexity rather than abstracting it away. The focus on AI infrastructure rather than end-user experience creates a steeper learning curve for mainstream adoption. @anoma is another one Anoma introduces an intent-centric paradigm with: ~ Generalized intents as the primary interaction model ~ Multi-chain state unification ~ Programmable data sovereignty Anoma's approach is more user focused than Warden's but remains architecturally complex. The intent centric model is powerful but requires significant changes to existing mental models and development practices which will require a lot of onboarding. But the winner in my opinion will be something like @infinex Infinex simply abstracts away all of the bridging and swapping needed to move chains and makes it the easiest and places trade to swap onchain. Infinex's approach to UX abstraction positions it to win the battle by MEETING USERS WHERE THEY ARE. Starting with familiar patterns rather than requiring new mental models. While Warden and Anoma push the boundaries of what's technically possible, Infinex focuses on what's practically adoptable.