Trendaavat aiheet
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.
The answer to this question is one of the "hidden superpowers" of Ethereum's rollup-centric roadmap.
Institutions have a choice - they can have their own chain, OR they can simply deploy their product on a pre-existing general purpose L2.
Robinhood, for example, have already launched tokenized stocks on Arbitrum One - they have also expressed intention to spin up their own Orbit chain.
L2s give institutions the ability to "test the waters" by deploying on a general purpose L2 first, at which point they can assess the demand for their product, and see if it makes sense to deploy their own chain.
They may also require a lot more customization to allow their product to better suite the needs of their customers - that's another reason why app-specific L2s may be required for some institutions/builders.

22 tuntia sitten
I have fully come around to the rollup architecture.
Yes everyone can build their own chain, and many with large existing distribution (sc Robinhood) will try.
However, running a chain isn't core to 98% of businesses out there.
Conseneus and shared DA need to happen but most companies won't choose that vector to differentiate.
Why would they? If you're building onchain social, retail brokerage, etc... why do you want to get into the nitty gritty of the infra?
It's extra operational cost and a massive splintering of focus.
So what I would expect is many companies try to build their own chains over the next two or three years before eventually giving up and using Ethereum, Celestia, Arbitrum, etc...
4,23K
Johtavat
Rankkaus
Suosikit